Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People in Interest of L.M.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People in Interest of L.M Anchor | green | “the provisions of this title shall be liberally construed to serve the welfare of children and the best interests of society.” | 3 |
| 2 | People ex rel. Z.P.S. | green | “the application of the preponderance of the evidence standard for all purposes in the underlying dependency or neglect determination comports with due process of law.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.