Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Esther Buchanan v. Northland Group, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Esther Buchanan v. Northland Group, Inc. Anchor | green | “the act protects 'all consumers,' the 'shrewd' as well as the gullible, from practices that would mislead the 'reasonable unsophisticated consumer,' one with some level of understanding and one willing to read the document with some care.” | 3 |
| 2 | Pamela Gillie v. Law Office of Eric A. Jones | green | “a debt collector violates 1692e, put simply, if the collection practice that he uses has the tendency to confuse the least sophisticated consumer.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.