Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 72 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Richard v. Brown.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richard v. Brown Anchor | green | “psychological, social, and occupational functioning on a hypothetical continuum of mental health-illness.” | 28 |
| 2 | Alemany v. Brown | green | “a veteran need only demonstrate that there is an 'approximate balance of positive and negative evidence' in order to prevail.” | 26 |
| 3 | Carpenter v. Brown | green | “psychological, social, and occupational functioning on a hypothetical continuum of mental health-illness.” | 13 |
| 4 | Richard v. Brown | green | “moderate symptoms (e.g., flat affect and circumstantial speech, occasional panic attacks) or moderate difficulty in social, occupational, or school functioning, (e.g., few friends, conflicts with peers or co-workers).” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.