Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Casto v. Sanders, Unpublished Decision (11-18-2005).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Casto v. Sanders, Unpublished Decision (11-18-2005) Anchor | green | “indemnity arises from contract, and is the right of a person, who has been compelled to pay what another should have paid to require complete reimbursement” | 3 |
| 2 | Motorists Mutual Insurance v. Huron Road Hospital | green | “negligence of two or more persons concurring, not necessarily in point of time, but in point of consequence, in producing a single indivisible injury.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.