Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Javier Hart.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Javier Hart Anchor | green | “guarantee anyone a lower sentence.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Clifton Shields | green | “lessened sentencing disparities between convictions involving crack cocaine and convictions involving powder cocaine . . . by, among other things, increasing the amount of crack cocaine necessary to trigger higher statutory minimum sentences (section 2) . . . .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.