Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Boesch v. Comsewogue Sch. Dist..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boesch v. Comsewogue Sch. Dist. Anchor | green | “there is no minimal dimension test or per se rule that the condition must be of a certain height or depth in order to be actionable” | 3 |
| 2 | Milewski v. Washington Mutual, Inc. | green | “in determining whether a defect is trivial as a matter of law, the court must examine all of the facts presented, including the width, depth, elevation, irregularity, and appearance of the defect along with the time, place, and circumstance of the injury” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.