Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources Anchor | green | “the supreme court has 'consistently emphasized that, in exploring the outer reaches of section 1331, determinations about federal jurisdiction require sensitive judgments about congressional intent, judicial power, and the federal system.” | 3 |
| 2 | West Virginia State University v. The Dow Chemical Company | green | “the well- pleaded complaint rule, which, absent diversity, prohibits removal unless a federal question appears on the face of the complaint” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.