Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Figueroa Lugo v. American Railroad Co. of Porto Rico.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Figueroa Lugo v. American Railroad Co. of Porto Rico Anchor | green | “el que tiene la oportunidad de poder ver a los testigos, observar su manera de declarar, apreciar sus contradicciones, dudas, vacilaciones e ir creando gradualmente en su consciencia la convicción en cuanto a si hay o no derecho al remedio solicitado” | 3 |
| 2 | Argüello López v. Argüello García | green | “ausencia de error, perjuicio, pasión y parcialidad” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.