Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 5 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from M.T v. v. Sonny Perdue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M.T v. v. Sonny Perdue Anchor | green | “whether claims asserting the rights of disabled children are brought pursuant to the idea, the ada, section 504, or the constitution, they must first be exhausted in state administrative proceedings.” | 3 |
| 2 | Babicz Ex Rel. Babicz v. School Board of Broward County | green | “exhaust the idea's administrative procedures to obtain relief that is available under the idea before bringing suit under section 504 and/or the ada.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.