Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 5 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Anderson, Vicente J. v. Zubieta, Alberto.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anderson, Vicente J. v. Zubieta, Alberto Anchor | green | “the question is whether the plaintiffs have cast such doubt on the defendant's credibility that a reasonable juror could regard it as pretext and infer a discriminatory motive” | 3 |
| 2 | Southwest Merchandising Corporation, D/B/A Handy Andy, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board | green | “infer that the company's explanations were pretextual and shielded an illicit motive” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.