Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 5 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Arcangel Alvarado v. Board of Trustees of Montgomery Community College, Raul Parilla, as President of Montgomery Community College.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arcangel Alvarado v. Board of Trustees of Montgomery Community College, Raul Parilla, as President of Montgomery Community College Anchor | green | “against the respondent named in the administrative charge” | 3 |
| 2 | Crosten v. Kamauf | green | “of these four factors, the second and third are the most important as they are most reflective of the two-fold purpose of the naming requirement.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.