Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 5 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Mack F. Flynn, AKA Maxie Flynn.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Mack F. Flynn, AKA Maxie Flynn Anchor | green | “we review de novo the ultimate question of whether a search or seizure was reasonable under the fourth amendment” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Roscoe B. Sargent | green | “this court reviews de novo the ultimate conclusion as to whether a search was reasonable within the meaning of the fourth amendment” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.