Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 5 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brankovic v. Snyder.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brankovic v. Snyder Anchor | green | “merely being forced to go to trial is not such a prejudice as will prevent the withdrawal of admissions.” | 3 |
| 2 | Intersouth Properties, Inc. v. Contractor Exchange, Inc. | green | “that the admitted requests either were refutable by admissible evidence having a modicum of credibility or were incredible on their face, and that its denial was not offered solely for the purposes of delay.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.