Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 5 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hanson v. Lucky Stores, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hanson v. Lucky Stores, Inc. Anchor | green | “a finite leave can be a reasonable accommodation under feha, provided it is likely that at the end of the leave, the employee would be able to perform his or her duties.” | 3 |
| 2 | Prilliman v. United Air Lines, Inc. | green | “fail to engage in a timely, good faith, interactive process” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.