Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 5 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sun Life Assurance Co. v. Sun Bancorp, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sun Life Assurance Co. v. Sun Bancorp, Inc. Anchor | green | “the law in massachusetts is well-established that isolated transactions unaccompanied by 'purposeful intent' on the part of a defendant and having only a 'slight effect on the commerce of the commonwealth' are not enough to support jurisdiction under subsection (a) of the long-a…” | 3 |
| 2 | Merced v. JLG Industries, Inc. | green | “the plaintiff ... must demonstrate that the defendant has a tangible connection to the forum through commercial or other appreciable contacts with the commonwealth.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.