Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 71 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Iraq Middle Market Development Foundation v. Harmoosh.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iraq Middle Market Development Foundation v. Harmoosh Anchor | green | “a court can grant summary judgment only if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, the case presents no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party demonstrates entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.” | 35 |
| 2 | Masoud Sharif v. United Airlines, Inc. | green | “if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 33 |
| 3 | Iraq Middle Market Development Foundation v. Harmoosh | green | “viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.