Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 68 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Halberstam v. Welch.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Halberstam v. Welch Anchor | green | “(1) an agreement between two or more persons; (2) to participate in an unlawful act, or a lawful act in an unlawful manner; (3) an injury caused by an unlawful overt act performed by one of the parties to the agreement; (4) which overt act was done pursuant to and in furtherance…” | 23 |
| 2 | Halberstam v. Welch | green | “(1) the party whom the defendant aids must perform a wrongful act that causes an injury; (2) the defendant must be generally aware of his role as part of an overall illegal or tortious activity at the time that he provides the assistance; and (3) the defendant must knowingly and…” | 13 |
| 3 | Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC | green | “(1) the nature of the act encouraged, (2) the amount of assistance given by defendant, (3) defendant's presence or absence at the time of the tort, (4) defendant's relation to the principal, (5) defendant's state of mind, and (6) the period of defendant's assistance.” | 7 |
| 4 | Brady v. Livingood | green | “any facts showing the existence or establishment of an agreement” | 5 |
| 5 | Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC | green | “aiding and abetting an act of international terrorism requires more than the provision of material support to a designated terrorist organization.” | 5 |
| 6 | Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC | green | “the mens rea required to establish material support in violation of 18 u.s.c. 2339b, which requires only knowledge of the organization's connection to terrorism, not intent to further its terrorist activities or awareness that one is playing a role in those activities.” | 4 |
| 7 | Weiss v. Nat'l Westminster Bank PLC | green | “evidence that a bank knowingly provided banking services to an fto, without more, is insufficient to satisfy jasta's scienter requirement.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.