Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 67 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from ESTATE OF.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ESTATE OF Anchor | green | “such a substantial departure from accepted professional judgment, practice, or standard, as to demonstrate that the person responsible actually did not base the decision on such a judgment.” | 25 |
| 2 | Trade Finance Partners, LLC v. AAR CORP. | green | “on which the jury could reasonably find for the nonmoving party.” | 21 |
| 3 | Julian J. Miller v. Albert Gonzalez | green | “we must . . . construe the record in the light most favorable to the nonmovant and avoid the temptation to decide which party's version of the facts is more likely true.” | 21 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.