Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 68 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re CN.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re CN Anchor | green | “encompasses the parent's compliance with the service plans and the court's directives, in light of the condition which gave rise to the removal of the child, and in light of other conditions which later become known and which would prevent the court from returning custody of the…” | 29 |
| 2 | In Re CN | green | “the benchmark for measuring a parent's 'progress toward the return of the child' under section 1(d)(m) of the adoption act encompasses the parent's compliance with the service plans and the court's directives, in light of the condition which gave rise to the removal of the child…” | 23 |
| 3 | People v. Adeline E. | green | “at a minimum, reasonable progress requires measurable or demonstrable movement toward the goal of reunification.” | 16 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.