Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 67 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Labarbera v. ASTC LABORATORIES INC..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Labarbera v. ASTC LABORATORIES INC. Anchor | green | “nevertheless, it remains for the court to consider whether the unchallenged facts constitute a legitimate cause of action, since a party in default does not admit conclusions of law.” | 31 |
| 2 | TAGC Management, LLC v. Lehman, Lee & Xu Ltd. | green | “prior to entering default judgment, a district court is required to determine whether the plaintiff's allegations establish the defendant's liability as a matter of law.” | 14 |
| 3 | Shah v. New York State Department of Civil Service | green | “left to the court's sound discretion.” | 11 |
| 4 | Labarbera v. ASTC LABORATORIES INC. | green | “it remains for the court to consider whether the unchallenged facts constitute a legitimate cause of action, since a party in default does not admit conclusions of law.” | 11 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.