Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 66 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Operating Engineers Local 324 Health Care Plan v. G & W Construction Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Operating Engineers Local 324 Health Care Plan v. G & W Construction Co. Anchor | green | “motions to strike are viewed with disfavor and are not frequently granted.” | 46 |
| 2 | Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States | green | “no possible relation to the controversy.” | 9 |
| 3 | Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States | green | “only when the pleading to be stricken has no possible relation to the controversy.” | 8 |
| 4 | United States v. Pretty Products, Inc. | green | “on the other hand, motions to strike 'serve a useful purpose by eliminating insufficient defenses and saving the time and expense which would otherwise be spent in litigating issues which would not affect the outcome of the case.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.