Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 66 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ristaino v. Ross.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ristaino v. Ross Anchor | green | “inextricably bound up with the conduct of the trial.” | 17 |
| 2 | Rosales-Lopez v. United States | green | “there is no constitutional presumption of juror bias for or against members of any particular racial or ethnic groups.” | 17 |
| 3 | Turner v. Murray | green | “a capital defendant accused of an interracial crime is entitled to have prospective jurors informed of the race of the victim and questioned on the issue of racial bias.” | 17 |
| 4 | Rosales-Lopez v. United States | green | “voir dire plays a critical function in assuring the criminal defendant that his sixth amendment right to an impartial jury will be honored.” | 15 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.