Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 66 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Michael P. Lewis v. David M. Fresne Lowell Farkas Robert A. Young Rosenfeld, Bernstein & Tannenhauser LLP Eric P. Rosenfeld.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michael P. Lewis v. David M. Fresne Lowell Farkas Robert A. Young Rosenfeld, Bernstein & Tannenhauser LLP Eric P. Rosenfeld Anchor | green | “there are two types of 'minimum contacts': those that give rise to specific personal jurisdiction and those that give rise to general personal jurisdiction.” | 22 |
| 2 | Quick Technologies, Inc. v. The Sage Group Plc And, Sage Us Holdings, Inc. Quick Technologies, Inc. v. Sage Software, Inc. | green | “affidavits, interrogatories, depositions, oral testimony, or any combination of the recognized methods of discovery.” | 14 |
| 3 | Mississippi Interstate Express, Inc. v. Transpo, Inc., Azcal, Inc. And Robert Zoller | green | “whether the minimum contacts are sufficient to justify subjection of the non-resident to suit in the forum is determined not on a mechanical and quantitative test, but rather under the particular facts upon the quality and nature of the activity with relation to the forum state.” | 7 |
| 4 | Walk Haydel & Associates, Inc. v. Coastal Power Production Co. | green | “but even if the court receives discovery materials, unless there is a full and fair hearing, it should not act as a fact finder and must construe all disputed facts in the plaintiff's favor and consider them along with the undisputed facts.” | 7 |
| 5 | Religious Technology Center v. Liebreich | green | “because the texas long arm statute is coextensive with the confines of due process, questions of personal jurisdiction in texas are generally analyzed entirely within the framework of constitutional constraints on due process.” | 6 |
| 6 | Quick Technologies, Inc. v. The Sage Group Plc And, Sage Us Holdings, Inc. Quick Technologies, Inc. v. Sage Software, Inc. | green | “may consider the contents of the record before the court at the time of the motion, including 'affidavits, interrogatories, depositions, oral testimony, or any combination of the recognized methods of discovery.” | 6 |
| 7 | Maria Frank v. P N K (Lake Charles) L.L.C. | green | “two paradigmatic places: (1) the state of incorporation and (2) the state where it has its principal place of business.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.