Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 66 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Michael Pagano v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General, Etc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michael Pagano v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General, Etc. Anchor | green | “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 39 |
| 2 | Robert C. Hahn v. Francis W. Sargent | green | “some indication that he can produce the quantum of evidence necessary to enable him to reach the jury with his claim.” | 23 |
| 3 | Swain v. Spinney | green | “only after the facts have been settled can the court determine whether the actions were objectively reasonable so as to fall under the qualified immunity umbrella” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.