Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 66 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Stern v. Marshall.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stern v. Marshall Anchor | green | “the question is whether the action at issue stems from the bankruptcy itself or would necessarily be resolved in the claims allowance process.” | 27 |
| 2 | BP RE, L.P. v. RML Waxahachie Dodge, L.L.C. | green | “the question is whether the action at issue stems from the bankruptcy itself or would necessarily be resolved in the claims allowance process.” | 16 |
| 3 | BP RE, L.P. v. RML Waxahachie Dodge, L.L.C. | green | “stems from the bankruptcy itself or it would necessarily be resolved in the claims allowance process.” | 15 |
| 4 | In Re Pena | green | “it is the duty of the bankruptcy court to make sure that any unclaimed funds of the bankruptcy estate are paid to the proper party.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.