Topic: the findings of fact and conclusions of law made by a court… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #5131

7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 66 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from University of Texas v. Camenisch.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 University of Texas v. Camenisch Anchor
scotus · 1981
green “the findings of fact and conclusions of law made by a court granting a preliminary injunction are not binding at trial on the merits.” 32
2 PLANNED PARENT. MN, N. DAKOTA, S. DAKOTA v. Rounds
ca8 · 2008
green “government action based on presumptively reasoned democratic processes,” 9
3 Wachovia Securities, L.L.C. v. Stanton
iand · 2008
green “to warrant a preliminary injunction, the moving party must demonstrate a sufficient threat of irreparable harm.” 6
4 S.J.W. Ex Rel. Wilson v. Lee's Summit R-7 School District
ca8 · 2012
green “to demonstrate irreparable harm, a party must show that the harm is certain and great and of such imminence that there is a clear and present need for equitable relief.” 5
5 Wachovia Securities, L.L.C. v. Stanton
iand · 2008
green “an illusory harm to the movant will not outweigh any actual harm to the non-movant.” 5
6 Bracco v. Lackner
cand · 1978
green “competence, personal knowledge and credibility of the affiant” 5
7 Wachovia Securities, L.L.C. v. Stanton
iand · 2008
green “the balance of harms analysis examines the harm of granting or denying the injunction upon both of the parties to the dispute and upon other interested parties, including the public.” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check