Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 65 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Texas Manufactured Housing Ass'n v. Nederland.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas Manufactured Housing Ass'n v. Nederland Anchor | green | “significant probative evidence” | 25 |
| 2 | Eric Smith v. Steve Brenoettsy, Lieutenant, John P. Whitley, Warden | green | “evidence in the record would not permit the nonmovant to carry its burden of proof at trial.” | 16 |
| 3 | Laughlin v. Olszewski,et al | green | “only when there is an actual controversy - that is, when both parties have submitted evidence of contradictory facts.” | 13 |
| 4 | Eric Smith v. Steve Brenoettsy, Lieutenant, John P. Whitley, Warden | green | “that might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law.” | 11 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.