Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 66 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wells Fargo & Co. v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wells Fargo & Co. v. United States Anchor | green | “is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” | 29 |
| 2 | Wells Fargo & Co. v. United States | green | “fails to apply or misapplies relevant statutes, case law or rules of procedure.” | 26 |
| 3 | Wells Fargo & Co. v. United States | green | “fails to apply or misapplies relevant statutes, case law or rules of procedure,” | 7 |
| 4 | Scott Ex Rel. Scott v. United States | green | “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.