Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 65 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Massaro v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Massaro v. United States Anchor | green | “in most cases a motion brought under 2255 is preferable to direct appeal for deciding claims of ineffective assistance.” | 44 |
| 2 | United States v. Juliana M. Cassiliano | green | “baseline aversion to resolving ineffectiveness claims on direct review.” | 9 |
| 3 | United States v. Juliana M. Cassiliano | green | “baseline aversion to resolving ineffectiveness claims on direct review” | 7 |
| 4 | United States v. Juliana M. Cassiliano | green | “entertained ineffective assistance claims for the first time on direct appeal when their resolution is beyond any doubt or to do so would be in the interest of justice.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.