Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 65 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Courtney Douglass v. Convergent Outsourcing.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Courtney Douglass v. Convergent Outsourcing Anchor | green | “(1) she is a consumer, (2) the defendant is a debt collector, (3) the defendant's challenged practice involves an attempt to collect a 'debt' as the act defines it, and (4) the defendant has violated a provision of the fdcpa in attempting to collect the debt.” | 26 |
| 2 | Caprio v. Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLC | green | “as remedial legislation, the fdcpa must be broadly construed in order to give full effect to these purposes.” | 12 |
| 3 | Courtney Douglass v. Convergent Outsourcing | green | “to prevail on an fdcpa claim, a plaintiff must prove that (1) she is a consumer, (2) the defendant is a debt collector, (3) the defendant's challenged practice involves an attempt to collect a 'debt' as the act defines it, and (4) the defendant has violated a provision of the fd…” | 9 |
| 4 | Dale Kaymark v. Bank of America NA | green | “to eliminate abusive debt collection practices by debt collectors” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.