Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 64 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Greif Companies (GENESCO) v. Sipe.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greif Companies (GENESCO) v. Sipe Anchor | green | “what constitutes a reasonable marketing effort depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case.” | 39 |
| 2 | National Linen Service v. McGuinn | green | “in determining whether a claimant has made a reasonable effort to market his remaining work capacity, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to . . . the prevailing party before the commission.” | 13 |
| 3 | National Linen Service v. McGuinn | green | “we view the evidence in the light most favorable to . . . the party prevailing before the commission.” | 7 |
| 4 | National Linen Service v. McGuinn | green | “we review the evidence in the light most favorable to . . . the party prevailing before the commission.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.