Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 64 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Yee v. City of Escondido.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yee v. City of Escondido Anchor | green | “once a federal claim is properly presented, a party can make any argument in support of that claim; parties are not limited to the precise arguments they made below.” | 46 |
| 2 | United States v. Awni Shauaib Zayyad | green | “to preserve an argument on appeal, the defendant must object on the same basis below as he contends is error on appeal.” | 14 |
| 3 | United States v. Burkett | green | “a determination whether there was reasonable suspicion to support an investigatory 'stop and frisk' is a mixed question of law and fact, also reviewed de novo.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.