Topic: close existing county roads asserted to be r.s. 2477 rights… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #5323

7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 63 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kane County Utah v. Salazar.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Kane County Utah v. Salazar Anchor
ca10 · 2009
green “close existing county roads asserted to be r.s. 2477 rights-of-way without a reasoned and nonarbitrary basis for doing so, such as an administrative determination, based on substantial evidence, that the asserted right-of-way is invalid” 9
2 The Wilderness Soc. v. Kane County, Utah
ca10 · 2009
green “exercise management authority before it proves that it has r.s. 2477 rights of way.” 9
3 The Wilderness Soc. v. Kane County, Utah
ca10 · 2009
green “panel decision . . . represents a broad shift in our caselaw” 9
4 Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Bureau of Land Management
ca10 · 2005
green “wear or damage to a road whether from natural or other causes.” 9
5 High Lonesome Ranch v. Board of County Commissioner
ca10 · 2023
green “the county wanted public access over the roadways that crossed blm land” 9
6 High Lonesome Ranch v. Board of County Commissioner
ca10 · 2023
green “the limitations period under the qta commences when the united states claims to have 'exclusive control of a road.” 9
7 Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors
scotus · 2024
green “rejecting the possibility that a limitations period commences at a time when the plaintiff could not yet file suit as inconsistent with basic limitations principles” 9

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check