5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Amended May 4, 2015 Dylan Book and Karen Book v. Voma Tire Corporation, Hunter Engineering Company, Iowa Tire, Inc., Holt Sales and Service, Inc., SICE, S.p.A. and SICE Automotive Equipment Societa Italiana Costruzioni Elettromeccaniche S.I.C.E.-S.p.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amended May 4, 2015 Dylan Book and Karen Book v. Voma Tire Corporation, Hunter Engineering Company, Iowa Tire, Inc., Holt Sales and Service, Inc., SICE, S.p.A. and SICE Automotive Equipment Societa Italiana Costruzioni Elettromeccaniche S.I.C.E.-S.p.A. Anchor | green | “stare decisis alone dictates continued adherence to our precedent absent a compelling reason to change the law.” | 23 |
| 2 | Minnesota v. National Tea Co. | green | “it is fundamental that state courts be left free and unfettered by us in interpreting their state constitutions.” | 10 |
| 3 | Davis v. United States | green | “decisions overruling this court's fourth amendment precedents are rare.” | 6 |
| 4 | State Of Iowa Vs. James Maximiliano Ochoa | green | “he reasonableness clause cannot be used to override the warrant clause.” | 6 |
| 5 | State v. Jackson | green | “strictly speaking, however, a state may still construe a provision of its constitution as providing less rights than are guaranteed by a parallel federal provision.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.