Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 canonical passages across 9 cases, quoted by 63 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alexander & Alexander Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alexander & Alexander Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc. Anchor | green | “violence or intimidation, defamation, injurious falsehood or other fraud, violation of criminal law, and the institution or threat of groundless civil suits or criminal prosecutions in bad faith.” | 13 |
| 2 | United Rental Equipment Co. v. Potts & Callahan Contracting Co. | green | “one not privileged to do so who purposely induces or causes a third person not to perform a contract or enter into or continue a business relation with another is liable for the harm caused thereby.” | 8 |
| 3 | Mixter v. Farmer | green | “identify a possible future relationship which is likely to occur, absent the interference, with specificity.” | 6 |
| 4 | Martello v. Blue Cross | green | “wrongful or malicious interference with economic relations is interference by conduct that is independently wrongful or unlawful, quite apart from its effect on the plaintiff's business relationships.” | 5 |
| 5 | Blondell v. Littlepage | green | “(1) intentional and willful acts; (2) calculated to cause damage to the plaintiffs in their lawful business; (3) done with the unlawful purpose to cause such damage and loss, without right or justifiable cause on the part of the defendants (which constitutes malice); and (4) act…” | 5 |
| 6 | LeJeune v. Coin Acceptors, Inc. | green | “personal insights and analysis brought to bear through diligent research and by marshaling a large volume of information” | 4 |
| 7 | BARON FINANCIAL CORP. v. Natanzon | green | “an essential element of a tortious interference claim is a showing that the actions undertaken were 'wrongful.” | 4 |
| 8 | Medical Mutual Liability Society v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc. | green | “causation in fact is concerned with the . . . inquiry of whether defendant's conduct actually produced an injury” | 4 |
| 9 | Kaser v. Financial Protection Marketing, Inc. | green | “independently wrongful or unlawful, quite apart from its effect on the plaintiff's business relationships.” | 3 |
| 10 | BARON FINANCIAL CORP. v. Natanzon | green | “a plaintiff 'must establish some evidence that a prospective business relationship is likely to occur.” | 3 |
| 11 | Mixter v. Farmer | green | “in order to sustain a claim for tortious interference with prospective advantage 'plaintiffs must identify a possible future relationship which is likely to occur, absent the interference, with specificity.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.