Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 64 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Ashlee R..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Ashlee R. Anchor | green | “affirmative and continuing duty to inquire” | 19 |
| 2 | In Re Baycol Cases I & II | green | “california follows a 'one shot' rule under which, if an order is appealable, appeal must be taken or the right to appellate review is forfeited.” | 15 |
| 3 | Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Ashlee R. | green | “where the court knows or has reason to know that an indian child is involved.” | 13 |
| 4 | Haaland v. Brackeen | green | “there is no resource that is more vital to the continued existence and integrity of indian tribes than their children.” | 10 |
| 5 | Riverside Cnty. Dep't of Pub. Soc. Servs. v. S.A. (In re N.G.) | green | “the purpose of icwa and related california statutes is to provide notice to the tribe sufficient to allow it to determine whether the child is an indian child, and whether the tribe wishes to intervene in the proceedings” | 4 |
| 6 | Riverside Cnty. Dep't of Pub. Soc. Servs. v. S.A. (In re N.G.) | green | “in the absence of an appellate record affirmatively showing the court's and the agency's efforts to comply with icwa's inquiry and notice requirements, we will not, as a general rule, conclude that 13 substantial evidence supports the court's finding that proper and adequate icw…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.