Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 63 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Preiser v. Newkirk.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Preiser v. Newkirk Anchor | green | “the rule in federal cases is that an actual controversy must be extant at all stages of review, not merely at the time the complaint is filed.” | 20 |
| 2 | Preiser v. Newkirk | green | “an actual controversy must be extant at all stages of review, not merely at the time the complaint is filed.” | 19 |
| 3 | Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Nueces County | green | “recognized two exceptions to the mootness doctrine: (1) the 'capable of repetition' exception and (2) the 'collateral consequences' exception.” | 6 |
| 4 | Jones v. Takaki | green | “the constitution does not require any procedure prior to the actual forfeiture proceeding.” | 5 |
| 5 | Smith v. City of Chicago | green | “given the length of time which can result between the seizure of property and the opportunity for an owner to contest the seizure under” | 5 |
| 6 | Smith v. City of Chicago | green | “fashion appropriate procedural relief consistent with this opinion.” | 4 |
| 7 | Prappas v. MEYERLAND COM. IMP. ASS'N | green | “prappas v. meyerland cmty. improvement ass'n, 795 s.w.2d 794, 795 (tex. app.-houston 14th dist. 1990, writ denied); see also in re miller, 433 s.w.3d 82, 84 (tex. app.-houston 1st dist. 2014, orig. proceeding) (” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.