Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 63 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co. Anchor | green | “as long as there is a set of facts, consistent with the plaintiff's complaint, which would allow the plaintiff to recover, the court may not grant a defendant's motion to dismiss.” | 21 |
| 2 | Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co. | green | “must presume that all factual allegations of the complaint are true and make all reasonable inferences in favor of the non-moving party.” | 19 |
| 3 | Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co. | green | “in construing a complaint upon a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, we must presume that all factual allegations of the complaint are true and make all reasonable inferences in favor of the non-moving party.” | 16 |
| 4 | Taylor v. City of London | green | “( ) it must appear beyond doubt from the complaint that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts entitling him to recovery.” | 4 |
| 5 | Taylor v. City of London | green | “it must appear beyond doubt from the complaint that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts entitling him to recovery.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.