Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 63 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Greenfield v. NJ Dept. of Corr..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greenfield v. NJ Dept. of Corr. Anchor | green | “an issue is 'moot' when the decision sought in a matter, when rendered, can have no practical effect on the existing controversy.” | 20 |
| 2 | Greenfield v. NJ Dept. of Corr. | green | “an issue is moot when the decision sought in a matter, when rendered, can have no practical effect on the existing controversy.” | 13 |
| 3 | De Vesa v. Dorsey | green | “a case is technically moot when the original issue presented has been resolved, at least concerning the parties who initiated the litigation.” | 10 |
| 4 | Betancourt v. Trinitas Hosp. | green | “a case is technically moot when the original issue presented has been resolved, at least concerning the parties who initiated the litigation.” | 10 |
| 5 | Betancourt v. Trinitas Hosp. | green | “courts normally will not decide issues when a controversy no longer exists, and the disputed issues have become moot.” | 6 |
| 6 | Greenfield v. NJ Dept. of Corr. | green | “when the decision sought in a matter, when rendered, can have no practical effect on the existing controversy.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.