Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 62 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Uncommon, LLC v. Spigen, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uncommon, LLC v. Spigen, Inc. Anchor | green | “to decide if there is a likelihood of confusion, courts ask whether consumers who might use either product would likely attribute them to a single source.” | 14 |
| 2 | Phoenix Entertainment Partners v. Dannette Rumsey | green | “claims for trademark infringement and unfair competition both require (1) that plaintiff's mark be validly registered and (2) that defendant's use be likely to cause confusion among consumers.” | 8 |
| 3 | Phoenix Entertainment Partners v. Dannette Rumsey | green | “uses in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of any goods or services on or in connection with which such use is likely to cause confusion, or to cau…” | 8 |
| 4 | Coach, Inc. v. 3D Designers Inspirations | green | “taking copyright infringement principles as a guide, courts apply the following factors to determine statutory damages for trademark infringement:” | 8 |
| 5 | Coach, Inc. v. 3D Designers Inspirations | green | “while a permanent injunction may harm defendants' profits if they are forced to discontinue” | 8 |
| 6 | Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Kizzang LLC | green | “the seventh circuit . . . has found that the public interest is served by an injunction enjoining the use of infringing trademarks because 'enforcement of the trademark laws prevents consumer confusion.” | 8 |
| 7 | H-D U.S.A., LLC v. SunFrog, LLC | green | “had developed and strengthened its marks over decades of exposure” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.