Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 60 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lehman v. Nakshian.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lehman v. Nakshian Anchor | green | “limitations and conditions upon which the government consents to be sued must be strictly observed and exceptions thereto are not to be implied.” | 34 |
| 2 | Edward Ashford v. USA | green | “federal courts must resolve questions of jurisdiction before proceeding to the merits.” | 7 |
| 3 | Stephen A. Cook v. United States of America, on Behalf of U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Occupational Safety & Health Administration | green | “even though the requirements of 2675 are minimal, an ftca claimant must nonetheless provide facts sufficient to allow his claim to be investigated and must do so in a timely manner.” | 4 |
| 4 | Western Radio Services Co. v. United States Forest Service | green | “because plaintiff's claims arise in a new context, we must ask whether there are 'special factors counselling hesitation in the absence of affirmative action by congress.” | 3 |
| 5 | Holmes v. Colorado Coalition for the Homeless Long Term Disability Plan | green | “services shall be provided as described in the official description of the position,” | 3 |
| 6 | Juan Vega, Jr. v. United States | green | “the supreme court has made clear that expanding the bivens remedy is now a disfavored judicial activity.” | 3 |
| 7 | Ignacio Lanuza v. Jonathan Love | green | “because plaintiff's claims arise in a new context, we must ask whether there are 'special factors counselling hesitation in the absence of affirmative action by congress.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.