Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 61 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Jones.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Jones Anchor | green | “appellate courts are prohibited from deciding moot controversies.” | 39 |
| 2 | National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Jones | green | “a case becomes moot if at any stage there ceases to be an actual controversy between the parties.” | 13 |
| 3 | Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hallman | green | “a controversy must exist between the parties at every stage of the legal proceedings, including the appeal” | 6 |
| 4 | Rudy Guillen v. U.S. Bank, N.A. | green | “appellate courts lack jurisdiction to decide moot controversies and render advisory opinions.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.