Topic: state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face. · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #5654

6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 61 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Robert Lodholtz v. York Risk Services Group, Inco.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Robert Lodholtz v. York Risk Services Group, Inco Anchor
ca7 · 2015
green “state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” 24
2 Ronald Forgue v. City of Chicago
ca7 · 2017
green “accepts as true all of the well-pleaded facts in the complaint and draws all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff.” 10
3 Robert Lodholtz v. York Risk Services Group, Inco
ca7 · 2015
green “in order to survive a motion to dismiss under rule 12(b)(6), a complaint must 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” 8
4 Ebner v. Fresh, Inc.
ca9 · 2016
green “it is likely to mislead a reasonable consumer in a material respect, even if it is not literally false.” 7
5 Kensington's Wine Auctioneers & Brokers, Inc. v. John Hart Fine Wine, Ltd.
illappct · 2009
green “to be eligible for injunctive relief under the deceptive practices act, a plaintiff must show the defendant's conduct will likely cause it to suffer damages in the future.” 6
6 Lee v. Ne. Ill. Reg'l Commuter R.R. Corp.
ca7 · 2019
green “even a complaint that passes muster under the liberal notice pleading requirements of federal rule of civil procedure 8(a)(2) can be subject to dismissal if a plaintiff does not provide argument in support of the legal adequacy of the complaint.” 6

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check