Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 61 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jock v. Zoning Board of Adjustment.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jock v. Zoning Board of Adjustment Anchor | green | “the proper scope of judicial review is not to suggest a decision that may be better than the one made by the board, but to determine whether the board could reasonably have reached its decision on the record.” | 22 |
| 2 | Fallon Prop. v. Bethlehem Plan Bd. | green | “when reviewing the decision of a trial court that has reviewed municipal action, we are bound by the same standards as was the trial court.” | 11 |
| 3 | Jock v. Zoning Board of Adjustment | green | “public bodies, because of their peculiar knowledge of local conditions, must be allowed wide latitude in their delegated discretion.” | 7 |
| 4 | Cell South of NJ, Inc. v. ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF WEST WINDSOR TWP. | green | “public bodies, because of their peculiar knowledge of local conditions, must be allowed wide latitude in their delegated discretion.” | 7 |
| 5 | Boe v. Zoning Bd. | green | “zoning boards may choose which witnesses, including expert witnesses, to believe.” | 6 |
| 6 | Jock v. Zoning Board of Adjustment | green | “refers solely to the particular physical condition of the property, not personal hardship to its owner, financial or otherwise.” | 4 |
| 7 | Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT. | green | “even were we to harbor reservations as to the good judgment of a local land use agency's decision, 'there can be no judicial declaration of invalidity in the absence of clear abuse of discretion by the public agencies involved.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.