Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 60 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Delores M. Brooks v. County Commission, Jefferson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Delores M. Brooks v. County Commission, Jefferson Anchor | green | “either directly by persuading the court that a discriminatory reason more likely motivated the employer or indirectly by showing that the employer's proffered explanation is unworthy of credence.” | 20 |
| 2 | Gordon Vessels v. Atlanta Independent School | green | “must reveal such weaknesses, implausibilities, inconsistencies, incoherencies or contradictions in the employer's proffered legitimate reasons for its actions that a reasonable factfinder could find them unworthy of credence.” | 10 |
| 3 | Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Joe's Stone Crabs, Inc. | green | “creates a rebuttable presumption that the employer unlawfully discriminated against her.” | 9 |
| 4 | Hca Health Services of Georgia, Inc. v. Employers Health Insurance Company | green | “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact.” | 9 |
| 5 | Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Joe's Stone Crabs, Inc. | green | “our inquiry 'proceeds to a new level of specificity,' in which the plaintiff must show that the proffered reason really is a pretext for unlawful discrimination.” | 8 |
| 6 | Underwood v. Perry County Commission | green | “creates a rebuttable presumption that the employer acted illegally.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.