Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 60 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re NYSE Specialists Securities Litigation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re NYSE Specialists Securities Litigation Anchor | green | “legal conclusions, deductions, or opinions couched as factual allegations . . . a presumption of truthfulness.” | 51 |
| 2 | Sibley v. FLORIDA JUD. QUALIFICATIONS COM'N | green | “frivolous and abusive filings must immediately come to an end” | 3 |
| 3 | In re Sibley | green | “respondent, by his conduct, has demonstrated his disregard and disrespect for the judiciary as well as his absence of remorse.” | 3 |
| 4 | Tapp v. Champagne | green | “a public defender does not act under color of state law when performing a lawyer's traditional functions as counsel to a defendant in a criminal proceeding.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.