Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 60 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. McFarland.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. McFarland Anchor | green | “if the facts necessary to adjudicate the claimed error are not in the record on appeal, no actual prejudice is shown and the error is not manifest.” | 42 |
| 2 | State v. Gibson | green | “emergent or exigent circumstances regarding the security and acquisition of incriminating evidence” | 5 |
| 3 | State v. McCormack | green | “a new rule for the conduct of criminal prosecutions is to be applied retroactively to all cases, state or federal, pending on direct review or not yet final” | 4 |
| 4 | DeHaven v. Gant | green | “even if an objection is made at trial, jones may only assign error in the appellate court on the specific ground of the evidentiary objection made at trial.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Patton | green | “a warrantless search is per se unreasonable, unless it falls within one of the carefully drawn exceptions to the warrant requirement.” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Gibson | green | “the determinative question is whether there were sufficient exigent circumstances to justify the seizure without a warrant.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.