Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 59 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Chicago.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Chicago Anchor | green | “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” | 15 |
| 2 | Buffalo Teachers Federation v. Tobe | green | “the law recognizes two species of takings: physical takings and regulatory takings.” | 13 |
| 3 | Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Chicago | green | “be taken for public use, without just compensation.” | 12 |
| 4 | Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency | green | “the extraordinary circumstance when no productive or economically beneficial use of land is permitted.” | 11 |
| 5 | 1256 Hertel Avenue Associates, LLC v. Calloway | green | “occurs when there is either a condemnation or a physical appropriation of property.” | 5 |
| 6 | Sherman v. Town of Chester | green | “effectively prevented the plaintiff from making any economic use of his property.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.