Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 59 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tafoya v. Salazar.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tafoya v. Salazar Anchor | green | “adequate food, clothing, shelter, sanitation, medical care, and reasonable safety from serious bodily harm.” | 23 |
| 2 | Schneider v. City of Grand Junction Police Department | green | “a challenged practice may be deemed an official policy or custom for 1983 municipal-liability purposes if it is a formally promulgated policy, a well-settled custom or practice, a final decision by a municipal policymaker, or deliberately indifferent training or supervision.” | 21 |
| 3 | Burke v. Regalado | green | “(1) a causal relationship between the policy or custom and the alleged violation of a constitutional right and (2) deliberate indifference.” | 15 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.