Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 58 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hart v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hart v. United States Anchor | green | “has a special obligation to consider whether it has subject matter jurisdiction in every case.” | 25 |
| 2 | United States v. Afremov | green | “federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.” | 18 |
| 3 | Junk Ex Rel. T.J. v. Terminix International Co. | green | “complete diversity, that is 'where no defendant holds citizenship in the same state where any plaintiff holds citizenship.” | 6 |
| 4 | Hart v. United States | green | “it is well established that a court has a special obligation to consider whether it has subject matter jurisdiction in every case.” | 6 |
| 5 | United States v. Afremov | green | “(federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.